FACULTY SENATE MEETING
MINUTES
March 9, 2009
3:15 p.m., 601 Rudder Tower
http://facultysenate.tamu.edu

Present:    Derya Akleman, Stephen Atkins, Karl Aufderheide,Guy Battle, Robert Bednarz, Michael Benedik, Tom Blasingame, Dragomir Bukur, Tahir Cagin, Gwendolyn Carroll, Antonio Cepeda-Benito, Keith Chaffin, Iftekharudd Choudhury, Louise Darcey, Walter Daugherity, John Fackler, Holly Gaede, Melinda Grant, Michael Greenwald, Robert Griffin, Mariah Hahn, Gary Halter, Mike Hanik, James Heilman, Joe Jaros, Eluned Jones, Guido Kanschat, Larry Kelly, Andrew Klein, Rafael Lara-Alecio, Ming-Han Li, Thomas Linton, Clinton Machann, Lanny Martindale, Christopher Mathewson, Robert McGeachin, Kathryn McKenzie, Tim Murphy, Adam Myers, Bo Norby, Ramona Paetzold, Brian Perkins, David Peterson, Angie Hill Price, Roger Schultz, Jorge Seminario, Douglas Slack, Robin Smith, Karen Snowden, Kathleen Speed, Richard Stadelmann, Robert Stewart, Bob Strawser, Ramesh Talreja, Elizabeth Tebeaux, Winfried Teizer, Frank Thomas, Manuelita Ureta, John Van-Huyck, Tom Vogel, Shelley Wachsmann, Hank Walker, Robert Warden, Gary Wingenbach, Thomas Woodfin

Paul Parrish (Interim Dean of Faculties)

Absent:    Louise Abbott, Carisa Armstrong, James Aune, Wolfgang Bangerth, Joe Cerami, Thomas DeWitt, Rainer Fink, Carlos Gonzalez, Richard Hutchinson, Vikram Kinra, Andre Landry, Robyn Lints, Carol Loopstra, Leon Luxemburg, R.N. Mahapatra, Sam Mannan, Peter McIntyre, Michael Messina, Frederic Pearl, Weston Porter, Khalid Qaraqe, Dan Roelke, Lynn Ruoff, Susan Stabile, John Stallone, Hamid Toliyat, Jyotsna Vaid, Gwendolyn Webb-Johnson, Thomas Welsh, William West, Matthew Whiteacre, Kirk Winemiller, Debra Zoran


Call to Order:
The meeting was called to order at 3:15 by Speaker Clint Magill. Speaker Magill opened the meeting by welcoming guests and senators. There was one senator from Galveston one senator from Qatar present via videoconferencing.

Guest Speaker:
Speaker Magill welcomed our guest speaker, Dr. Mark Troy, Associate Director Measurement and Research Services.  Dr. Troy presented the results of a national survey of student engagement. (SEE SLIDESHOW)

Dr. Troy compared TAMU freshmen and seniors with other AAUDE students; in general A&M students were at the lower end of the scale. A&M ranked highest in the “supportive environment” category.

Faculty is asked to urge students to respond to request from Provost Vitter for participation in NSSE surveys; faculty will be asked to take a similar survey.

Questions for Mark Troy:
Senator Kanschat: Re: qualifiers for survey.
Mark Troy:  Students responded to questions about the freshman experience with reference to the college they attended as freshmen.

Senator Woodfin: How many students participated in survey?
Mark Troy:    In 2007: c. 1200 seniors participated; c. 1100 freshmen responded.

Senator Greenwald:  Were size of classes factored into the survey?
Mark Troy:     The survey compared TAMU to other large institutions (e.g., Ohio State) with the understanding that class sizes would be comparable.

Senator Matthewson:  Did scores increase/decrease between 2001 and 2007?
Mark Troy:  The gaps between TAMU and other institutions seem to have remained relatively constant.

Speaker Comments:
Speaker Magill stated he has represented the Senate on several occasions.  He attended the assessment conference that was held here at the Hilton with attendees from all over the country. Lorraine Phillips and our assessment folks provide a real service by hosting this event. He stated he did get a chance to talk with the assessment expert hired by Texas Tech to help get them get off SACs probation.  She indicated that one of their critical changes was to reduce the number of core courses, first by eliminating blanket inclusion of courses that would satisfy a core area and, secondly, by making it mandatory that every core course shows through its syllabus how it maps to both the Higher Education Coordinating Board core requirements and Tech’s own core requirements.  She indicated that this mandate had led to many voluntary dropouts, especially for courses that were seldom or rarely used to satisfy core requirements.

Speaker Magill stated he was pleased with our turnout to attend the joint meeting with the UT Faculty Council a week ago today, and he thanked those who were able to attend for doing so.  He thanked Bob Bednarz and the organizers from UT for the program they put together. He attended the session on shared governance and it is clear we share some common problems, especially in communications, both down to faculty from administration and up to administrators from faculty. He hopes all of our caucus leaders are taking the initiative of reporting results of our meetings, especially things that are of direct concerns to their faculty.  EC member Walter Daugherity has volunteered to help anyone who wants to set up a college list-serve to do so.  He stated the SET issue was also a topic of that meeting and in general they heard what they already realized, that student evaluations can be valid, but should not be used as a sole indicator of effectiveness.

Magill noted that at the joint meeting they also heard a report from the UT legislative liaison that some sort of tuition regulation bill will be passed this session. That point was echoed by the U of H legislative liaison in the Texas Council of Faculty Senates meeting that Magill attended last Friday and Saturday morning, which was also in Austin. The U of H liaison was a bit more optimistic that the state will be willing to kick in lots more dollars unless they want to see college enrollments stagnate.  The estimate is that it will take $875 million more in the General Education bill in the next session just to cover the growth in student population expected by 2015.

He indicated that Senator Zaffirini, Chair of the Senate Education Committee, had recently submitted a bill that would perhaps help in our case by allowing tuition to be raised up to 5%, or greater if approved by a student referendum, and that would also raise the return on grant funds to 1.5 million per $10 million outside research funding, which would split the difference between the current rate and what Dr. Murano has been urging. 

Speaker Magill also met with the other A&M System speakers/presidents and stated the major topic was the SET business.  Other than Prairie View’s Dr. Grace Goodie, he said the rest of us are still opposed and those that were not part of this so-called trial run (us, PV and Kingsville) are not happy as they have been told the results will be based purely on the scores of the evaluations, with no modifications for small classes, grade inflation, etc.  Magill was talking with Dr. Murry Leaf, the Speaker for UT-Dallas who teaches ethics.  He suggested if their system gets hit with a similar scheme, he will make an offer to his classes to return the funds to a student scholarship fund if they will vote him a winner.

Another topic at the TCFS meeting involved campus security, which was heightened by a recent attempted murder on the UTD campus, and by reports that there is lots of legislative support to mandate that all University campuses be required to allow permitted gun carriers to carry on campus.  Perhaps that accounts for the proposed change in System regulation 34.06.02 dealing with firearms (now weapons) on campuses.  One of the changes includes the wording:

Reason for Regulation
This regulation provides a mechanism by which system members may authorize weapons otherwise prohibited by Section 46.03 of the Texas Penal Code. Without such written authorization, weapons are prohibited on property owned or controlled by the system.

Sentiment at the TCFS meeting led to a resolution opposing the change in the law;  
                                    
                                          HAND GUN RESOLUTION  

                   WHEREAS, allowing concealed firearms on university campuses
                   threatens our ability to create and maintain a safe, open learning
                   environment for students, faculty and staff,

                   Be it resolved that the members of Texas Council of Faculty Senates
                   oppose any legislation or initiatives that will overturn the present
                   prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons on university campuses.

Speaker Magill stated he's not sure if that is something we could do legally as a Senate, but you as an individual could certainly express your opinion, whichever way you feel.  At our systems group, we wondered about getting either “red alarm” buttons in the classrooms or providing the type of signaling devices advertised for older folks as a means of providing quick emergency warnings.

There was also lots of discussion at the meeting concerning the governor’s “Higher Education Reforms, Actions at the Institutional or System Level”. He noted a copy was provided on the entry table.  He stated that many of the things are actually already available information, that some things are logical, but that others are at best naïve and even “crazy”.  The U of H faculty is greatly concerned that their regents are taking the whole thing to heart. 

Magill stated the Senate EC is meeting with all 3 VPR candidates when they visit and so will have some input into the hire.  He encouraged senators to go to the open forum if they can.

Magill gave a special thanks to Dr. Bob Strawser for agreeing to respond to a 50 question questionnaire dealing with athletic program interfaces with the University.  It is sponsored by the COIA, which is a coalition on intercollegiate athletics of Div. I university faculty senates.  

Installation of New Senators:
Speaker Magill officially installed the new Senators (Ming-Han Li, Gary Halter and Shelley Wachsmann).

Marti Loudder and Mark Gold Address the Senate:
Marti Loudder: “Confrontation” between President Murano and students over the hiring of Gen. Webber as VP-Student Affairs. She also raised the issue of Senate Resolution re the hiring/retention of Deans, VPs, etc. It appears the Chancellor has issued a “pocket veto” re this regulation; she therefore urged the Senate to investigate why this resolution hasn’t been signed. She asked the EC to open dialogue with student leaders re shared governance. Loudder introduced SBP Mark Gold for comments.

Mark Gold:  A bill has been presented by 5-6 student (student) senators to established “a summit” at which students, faculty, and administrators would clarify expectations re shared governance.

Questions/Responses:
Senator Hahn: Cautioned students to choose words carefully when criticizing administrators.
  Mark Gold: Agreed and accepted this advice.

Senator Price:  Noted that on April 4 a panel on shared governance is scheduled; President Murano will participate.

Senator Blasingame: Reminded Senators that in the past he warned them about the changing nature of shared governance, for which he was booed (he was again booed). He urged students to take their grievances to the Chancellor because, in his estimation, that is where the problem rests.

Senator Stadelmann (as parliamentarian) said be receives more calls on matters of shared governance than any other issue. Faculty power is generally determined by precedent, and  Dr. Gates tried to codify some of these issues.

  Motion Passed FS.26.87
The February 9 Faculty Senate meeting minutes were approved as submitted. Attachment A
 
CONSENT AGENDA  
The consent agenda was approved as submitted.  
   
Graduate Council
New Courses - February 5, 2009 Motion Passed FS.26.88
ECEN 660  BioMEMS and Lab-on-a-Chip Attachment B1
MSEN 684   Professional Internship Attachment B2
     
Course Changes - February 5, 2009  
BMEN 608 Optical Diagnostic and Monitoring Principles Attachment B3
BMEN 609 Optical Therapeutic and Interventional Principles Attachment B4
BMEN 620 Bio-Optical Imaging Attachment B5
BMEN 680 Biomedical Engineering of Tissues Attachment B6
OCEN  671 Ocean Wave Mechanics Attachment B7
OCEN  678   Fluid Dynamics for Ocean and Environmental Engineering Attachment B8
OCEN  682 Coastal Sediment Processes Attachment B9
OCEN  683 Estuary Hydrodynamics Attachment B10
     
Course Withdrawals - February 5, 2009  
BMEN 601 Foundations of Biomedical Engineering Analyses Attachment B11
BMEN 602 Instrumentation and Measurement in Biomedical Systems Attachment B12
BMEN 612 Experimentation Attachment B13
BMEN 614 Modeling of Biomedical Systems Attachment B14
BMEN 638 Control Mechanisms in Living Systems Attachment B15
BMEN 673 Radiation Biology Attachment B16
     
     
University Curriculum Committee Motion Passed FS.26.89
New Courses - February 13, 2009 Attachment C
AGSM 355 Energy and Conversion Systems  
BAEN 414 Renewable Energy Conversions  
ENGL 331 Fantasy Literature  
     
Course Changes- February 13, 2009  
BAEN 474

Unit Operations in Food Processing

 
CHEN 474 Unit Operations in Food Processing  
SPAN 221 Field Studies I  
SPAN 222 Field Studies II  
THAR 320 Directing I  
     
     
W-Courses Motion Passed FS.26.90
Certification:   Attachment D
ANSC 402 Exploring Animal Industries  
     
Recertification:    
ALED 440 Principles ofTechnological Change  
EHRD 371 Applied Learning Principles  
GEOG 430 Environmental Justice  
INTS 481 Senior Thesis  
MUSC 206 Music Theory III  
POLS 454 Contemporary Political Ideas  
POLS 456 Environmental Political Theory  
SCSC 460 Problems in Agronomy, Plants  
SCSC 461 Problems in Agronomy, Soils  
THAR 381 Theatre History  
THAR 382 Theatre History  
     
__________________________________________End of Consent Agenda__________________________________________________
 
COMMITTEE REPORTS
 
     
Graduate Council Motion Passed FS.26.91
Special Consideration - February 5, 2009 Attachment E
Proposal to Initiate a Graduate Certificate Program in Petroleum Geoscience  
     
Special Consideration - February 5, 2009 Motion Passed FS.26.92

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
    Request to Move Interdepartmental Degree Programs from Colleges to Departments

Attachment F

Speaker Magill asked about “Plant Breeding:
Senator Matthewson clarified the issue to the Speaker’s satisfaction.

Senator Klein asked if the rule would apply to all colleges. 
Several respondents: No, only to COALS.

 
   
     
Executive Committee Motion Passed FS.26.93
Revisions to Student Rules:  14 Attachment G1

Senator Daugherity read the rule which addresses a change to accommodate courses that are repeated for a better grade course.

Senator Price asked if this was a repeat of the December initiative. (It isn’t.)

Senator Grant asked Chris Boyd, who oversees degree audits, to explain the regulation:
Chris Boyd: this is a process that happens within degree audit and the rule describes the way it functions under current practice. The new wording was suggested by Registrar D. Carter.

Senator Strawser asked if TAMU might be asking for trouble if there are two current ways to calculate GPA.

Senator Price: Degree audit needs to conform to extant TAMU regulations, which seem contrary to the proposed rule.

Senator Daugherity believed that the change may be requested to accommodate the new COMPASS system.

Senator Grant introduced VP-Undergraduate Affairs Martyn Gunn:
VP Gunn:  The rule is an attempt to unify procedures across the university; if student masters the material in the course, s/he should be recognized for having done so. This system does not alter the accumulative GPA.

Chris Boyd: This rule revision will not require departments to do anything because  used only to determine eligibility for graduation. It does not affect the cumulative GPA.

Senator Smith: TAMU should not make changes in its regulations to accommodate vendors.

Senator Martindale spoke as advisor in the Mays School of Business; he is wary of COMPASS “wagging the [university] dog,” and asked if the Senate’s approval of the rule would  requires departments to govern differently?
Chris Boyd: No.

Senator Price argued that the rule does not address the issue of GPA.
Chris Boyd suggested that a friendly amendment be added at the end stating that the rule was “for degree audit purposes only.”

Senator Strawser urged that a uniform rule be applied across colleges.

Senator Daugherity proposed an amendment (seconded by several): add “for degree audit requirements only” at the end of Rule 14.9.
The amendment passed.

VP Gunn offered a point of clarification:  This regulation has nothing to do with COMPASS.

   
  Removed
Revisions to Student Rules:  1.16.2 Attachment G2
Speaker Magill said to remove student rule 1.16.2 because the Faculty Senate already addressed this rule this session  
   
  Motion Passed FS.26.94
Revisions to Student Rules:  10.20 Attachment G3
   
   
  Motion Passed FS.26.95
Revisions to Student Rules:  12.6.3 Attachment G4

Requires that students be notified of their status in writing when on probation.

Senator Smith questioned the ambiguity of the wording of the regulation, and asked whether the e-mail system was secure enough to allow for communications re grades and student status.

Senator Benedik asked for clarification of meaning of “probation” in this regulation.
Chris Boyd:  Departments may define probation according to their particular needs.
Senator Benedik asked what happens if TAMU doesn’t notify student that s/he is on probation?

Senator Daugherity noted that the regulation adds the words “in writing.”

Senator Hahn said that there have been some problems in her department when students weren’t informed in writing that they were on probation.

Senator Choudhury wondered if sending an e-mail notifying a student of probation was not a violation of FERPA guidelines because probation is the result of poor grades and grade-issues are not supposed to be sent via e-mail.   

The revision was approved by a show of hands: 29-17.
   
   
Revision to the Senate By-Laws:
   Name Change of Reporting Committee
      Evans Library Council to the University Library Council
Motion Passed FS.26.96
Attachment H
     
     
    Tabled
Resolution on Proposed Faculty Evaluation Changes Attachment I

Senator Smith noted concerns among the Liberal Arts Caucus re timeline for approving the evaluation procedures.  He believed the resolution is an ”endorsement” of the resolution and proposed an amendment (seconded by several):
     In the fourth paragraph, replace he words “endorses the proposed changes with
     the following modifications, concerns, or exceptions” with “expresses the   
    following concerns about the proposed modifications.”

Senator Matthewson rose to support the amendment and expressed concerns that he could not take "graduate" students on field trips because of safety issues and the expenses they might concur.

VP-University Initiatives Karan Watson reported that the timeline has been changed until end of semester and addressed concerns about safety and field trip issues. Most concerns have been addressed in a revision of the document re Faculty Evaluations.

Senator Matthewson moved to table the resolution (Price seconded).

Senator Schultz raised a point of order re the procedure by which a motion to table is voted upon. 
The Resolution [including Senator Smith’s amendment] was tabled.
     
     

The Bylaws Committee recommends the following revisions to the Senate By-Laws (See Attachment)
For Informational Purposes Only

Attachment J
     
     
Unfinished Business:  
     

New Business:

   
     

Committee of the Whole:

 

Senator Price asked that a $25 processing fee added to amount of season football tickets be investigated by the Executive Committee.

Senator Grant introduced student Colin Loveless:
Loveless asked that old syllabi be made available for students as they consider whether to take a course.

Senator Bednarz
responded that he believed that most departments have syllabi on file.

VP-UI Watson
said that old syllabi should be made available to students at registration times.

Senator Kanschat encouraged the Provost to convene a committee to discuss changes to the Academic Master plan and Faculty Evaluations.

Senator Halter noted that Political Science keeps a two-year backlog of syllabi on the department’s web site.

Senator Grant expressed her dismay over the new SLATE criterion, particularly that 1-2 hour courses are being excluded from consideration which eliminates some faculty from applying for awards.

Senator Matthewson expressed concerns about proposed web-site requirements for faculty.

Senator Greenwald pointed out that the requirements were issued by the University of Houston Board of Regents and that the material was sent to TAMU to alert faculty that such matters may eventually be required by the TAMU regents.

Senator Walker advised students to look at departmental web-site for other forms of information about a course (e.g., Power Point presentations).

VPUI Watson noted that the University of Texas-Austin is already working on issues confronting the Houston faculty.
     
Adjourn:    

The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 pm.